Of course white supremacy is a business. Capitalism is their greatest weapon. We're forced to pay our oppressors for our survival. The creatures we used to cast out figured out a way to make us dependent on them. They forget those lazy assholes need us much more than we need them. They hate us for that. Enough to actively kill us every single mother fucking day. They won't stop until they're made to.
Here's another case example with same egregious dynamics perpetrated by the U.S. govt admin. And similarly nobody seems to give a fuck or wants to economically assist the victim.
I support any effort to reduce racial hatred, this whole event is shameful. But I don’t know who you are or what you’re trying to say. I’m skeptical of anyone using the phrase “anti-vaxers”. You should be aware that the group with the highest level of vaccine resistance is African Americans, and you should know why. Racial issues are complicated enough without unnecessary ambiguity. I also question the judgement of someone invoking the Rittenhouse case without mentioning that the two people he shot were white. I don’t mean that as a defense of Rittenhouse, but as a defense of truth.
Sera, you’re not adding nuance—you’re laundering white supremacy through deflection.
Citing Black vaccine hesitancy to defend the broader “anti-vax” movement is manipulative. That movement is dominated by white grievance, pseudoscience, and eugenics. Don’t co-opt Black trauma to excuse it.
And invoking that Rittenhouse killed white people? Irrelevant. He was a white vigilante radicalized by anti-Black hatred who inserted himself into a protest against police violence. The ideology he served wasn’t about who he shot—it was about why he showed up armed.
This article exposed a white woman who used a racial slur against an autistic Black child and was financially rewarded for it. Instead of confronting that, you tried to reframe the discussion to make white supremacy more palatable.
I didn’t reframe anything, and I didn’t wasn’t adding nuance. I was correcting what I think are errors. You’re twisting my words around your prejudices. Forgive me, but that only makes me further question your judgment. “The anti vax movement is dominated by white grievance”??? “Laundering white supremacy through deflection “??? No need for a reply, your time would be better spent in other places. Best wishes.
Sera, you weren’t correcting errors—you were centering your discomfort and demanding the conversation cater to white fragility.
Yes, the anti-vax movement is dominated by white grievance, pseudoscience, and conspiracies rooted in eugenics. That’s not opinion—it’s documented reality. What you’re calling “prejudice” is actually naming systems you’re clearly unwilling to interrogate.
You didn’t engage with the harm done to a Black autistic child. You bypassed the racist violence entirely to moralize about tone and redirect toward irrelevant points that shield whiteness. That is laundering white supremacy—because it protects power instead of challenging it.
You questioned my judgment because I called out structural violence. That says more about your priorities than mine.
Dismissive deflection doesn’t make you right. It just makes you complicit.
Paradox, they call black people animals and violent but are the actual violentones and show wild animal behaviour...
Of course white supremacy is a business. Capitalism is their greatest weapon. We're forced to pay our oppressors for our survival. The creatures we used to cast out figured out a way to make us dependent on them. They forget those lazy assholes need us much more than we need them. They hate us for that. Enough to actively kill us every single mother fucking day. They won't stop until they're made to.
Here's another case example with same egregious dynamics perpetrated by the U.S. govt admin. And similarly nobody seems to give a fuck or wants to economically assist the victim.
https://open.substack.com/pub/treeborne/p/new-daily-reminder-to-the-court-forum?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=5nefo
https://open.substack.com/pub/treeborne/p/new-address-to-the-publiccourt-forum?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=5nefo
I support any effort to reduce racial hatred, this whole event is shameful. But I don’t know who you are or what you’re trying to say. I’m skeptical of anyone using the phrase “anti-vaxers”. You should be aware that the group with the highest level of vaccine resistance is African Americans, and you should know why. Racial issues are complicated enough without unnecessary ambiguity. I also question the judgement of someone invoking the Rittenhouse case without mentioning that the two people he shot were white. I don’t mean that as a defense of Rittenhouse, but as a defense of truth.
Sera, you’re not adding nuance—you’re laundering white supremacy through deflection.
Citing Black vaccine hesitancy to defend the broader “anti-vax” movement is manipulative. That movement is dominated by white grievance, pseudoscience, and eugenics. Don’t co-opt Black trauma to excuse it.
And invoking that Rittenhouse killed white people? Irrelevant. He was a white vigilante radicalized by anti-Black hatred who inserted himself into a protest against police violence. The ideology he served wasn’t about who he shot—it was about why he showed up armed.
This article exposed a white woman who used a racial slur against an autistic Black child and was financially rewarded for it. Instead of confronting that, you tried to reframe the discussion to make white supremacy more palatable.
scary the way you’re just spewing pseudoscience and eugenics.
I didn’t reframe anything, and I didn’t wasn’t adding nuance. I was correcting what I think are errors. You’re twisting my words around your prejudices. Forgive me, but that only makes me further question your judgment. “The anti vax movement is dominated by white grievance”??? “Laundering white supremacy through deflection “??? No need for a reply, your time would be better spent in other places. Best wishes.
Sera, you weren’t correcting errors—you were centering your discomfort and demanding the conversation cater to white fragility.
Yes, the anti-vax movement is dominated by white grievance, pseudoscience, and conspiracies rooted in eugenics. That’s not opinion—it’s documented reality. What you’re calling “prejudice” is actually naming systems you’re clearly unwilling to interrogate.
You didn’t engage with the harm done to a Black autistic child. You bypassed the racist violence entirely to moralize about tone and redirect toward irrelevant points that shield whiteness. That is laundering white supremacy—because it protects power instead of challenging it.
You questioned my judgment because I called out structural violence. That says more about your priorities than mine.
Dismissive deflection doesn’t make you right. It just makes you complicit.
“didn’t wasn’t adding nuance” clearly
A business! Maybe worse than this...